The Consequences of False Heliocentric Science

View previous topic View next topic Go down

The Consequences of False Heliocentric Science

Post by flatterme on Wed Nov 09, 2016 7:17 pm

Is Heliocentrism, the currently accepted theory of the universe, of a stationary sun and moving round earth, an evil theory? Is modern science's version of the universe wrong, as Pope Alexander VII, Pope Urban VIII, St. Robert Bellarmine and other popes and saints taught? Is it important to know whether or not the earth is moving or fixed, round or flat? Modern science admits that round moving earth (Heliocentrism) is only a theory*. But with evidence available to the contrary, have we really considered the implications of living with a false notion of creation? In 1633 the Catholic Church spoke using definitive language, declaring in defense of scripture, that two scientific Heliocentric propositions, the basics of its theory, were false:

That the sun is immovable and that the earth moves.**

Does it really matter?

It is well-known that science has been at war with Christianity through the centuries. Protestant scientist, Gerardus Bouw*** explains to what degreee. "Historians readily acknowledge that the Copernican Revolution [i.e., the idea that 'the earth moves and turns'] spawned the bloody French and Bolshevic revolutions... set the stage for the ancient Greek dogma of evolution...led to Marxism and Communism...It is reported that Marx even acknowledged his indebtedness to Copernicus, without whom Marx believed that his ideas would not have gained much acceptance...It is thus a small step to total rejection of the Bible and the precepts of morality and law taught therein."

Many people believe Copernican heliocentric science has proven the earth to be round and moving, largely because they think they have seen round, rotating earth from space. Evidence is overwhelming NASA has doctored their images of earth. NASA even admits there are no authentic photos of earth, but all are composites, created by artists using Photoshop and other software programs. With atheistic NASA at the helm of all cosmic science, and admittedly atheistic evolutionary agenda, being in charge of every photo, every video taken from space, is it so hard to believe that they would stop at nothing to promote themselves and their Luciferian agenda, as well as prevent everyone from discovering their deception? People still wonder: "If there is a cover-up, how could NASA accomplish such a grand scheme lying about the universe? And why?" Well, there is a very good reason. And the truth is, they are doing it, and it is provable, for those willing to face the truth.

A round rotating earth is focused on the sun, making the sun the all important center of the universe. There's an old saying, "the world doesn't revolve around you" which suggests that such a person is acting as though they think they are God. Anything centered upon, in essence, can be the object of worship. Self-centeredness is basically, self worship. So if the earth revolves around the sun, it automatically follows that if the sun is made the central focus of earth and its inhabitants, it winds up in itself, the position of worship, in the place of a god where only a creature exists. If this isn't possible, why all the fuss from traditional minded Catholics when the corruptors of Vatican II moved the tabernacle with Jesus in it to the most obscure place in the church? Heliocentrism is the same principle, it is the moving, even the reshaping of God's Word, the Incarnation off to obscurity in order to replace truth with a lie.

If pagans of modern science, in lockstep with NASA are the generators for reorienting the world, once accomplished, what's to stop them from replacing the creator? This has always been their ultimate goal and the accomplishment for many is complete. Modern science rejects Catholicism and its God. Modern science is preferred over God. It preaches a new religion: of millions year old earth, evolution, atheism, global warming, alien life, and the Big Bang. It works to lay a scientifically backed, physical foundation for a new world religion so that all mankind will worship the original liar, the Evil One, the Antichrist and prove it scientifically. Satan has always wanted to be God. In order for his plan to be effected, the Evil One needs to re-create the world in his own image. Literally.

A round, wobbling, rotating, orbiting earth that whirls about in four directions as NASA claims, with man unaware of that motion, strikes awe in the smallest child. At the same time it fundamentally confuses and unsettles us at the deepest levels. What can be secure or true when our very foundation is constantly shifting at thousands of miles per hour? Then again, everything is a contradiction on a moving globe. Water behaves contrary to its own nature, never settling flat because water surface somehow remains curved around the outside of a sphere despite contrary trajectory of directions and high speeds of the planet on which it rests. People walk upside down relative to each other on a globe, but that's forgiven because of a new discovery in the twentieth century called 'gravity', an unexplained force no one really gets because it cannot be measured, and that changes with every circumstance. NASA asserts Heliocentrism proven by having gone to the moon in the 1960's. Man went to the moon with 1960's technology? That notion has been in serious doubt for years. The moon hoax is another study well worth considering as it reveals the length to which NASA will go to further their lie. Since humans are both spiritual and physical beings, it follows that just one twisted notion about our environment would profoundly affect our perceptions of ourselves, and of God.

Heliocentricity, once rejected by society has certainly become widely accepted, even to the point of scorn for those that do not believe the theory. With its roots traced back to Kaballah****, Jewish mysticism is the founder of this science. New Age spirituality, Illuminism, and Kabbalistic teachings are popular in modern culture, yet how few realize that heliocentricity was the science at the heart of all those religions? While some saints considered Heliocentrism apart from its religion a possibility, the theory was really only accepted in elite learning circles of Gnosticism until Galileo came along in the 1600's. From there, the development of Heliocentrism from fable into an accepted fact came after the Galileo Affair in the 1600's when the world rejected the Church's teaching on the matter. The details of the matter are documented in the book: The Pontifical Decrees Concerning the Motion of the Earth and the Ultramontane Defense Against Them.

*****St. Nilus prophesied a devastating apostasy of science for our times. Matthew 24: 24 also warned us. "For false christs and false prophets will rise and show great signs and wonders to deceive, if possible, even the elect." Now if even the elect are at risk for being tricked with new teachings, and with mounting evidence to prove it, is it so wrong to consider Heliocentrism suspect?

Is there anyone who can say that modern science has remained untouched by the same lies and deceit infiltrating all other parts of society? Why is Catholicism seen as nothing less than a scandal with regards to science? Science brags that Galileo was right, and the Church and scripture were wrong. As a result, the bible has lost all credibility for most people with regard to science. Can science, at odds with the Church, be correct at the expense of the Church? What Catholics do not realize is that the Church proscribes science. Not the other way around.

Without fixed foundations like the Church and scripture, it would be impossible to get to heaven. Without a firm foundation under our feet, we may expect similar results. So lets consider that if the earth is in motion and round like a ball, it is without true directions "up" or "down" because "up" and "down" by definition are impossible on a sphere. Nothing regarding direction is as it is defined and understood. Obviously, with the ground curved. A sphere cannot be on the level by definition. Everything out in space would be 'up' whether it is upside down on the bottom of the globe or right side up on top. So, in fact, there really is no true 'up'. 'Down' is also relative because it is not truly straight down, but angles toward the center of the ball earth. With 'down' needing a new definition and 'up' in question, its easy for the mind to wonder what scripture means that Christ has 'risen'. Rising and ascending are terms which work on a level, but are only relative on a sphere. To those on the top side of the globe Jesus 'rose' sideways, and for those on the opposite side of the Resurrection and Ascension, Jesus went the opposite of 'up' which is actually, down!

In the Heliocentric theory, the Son of God is not to be found at the center of His own universe, but rather, the sun god, or sun of god, the worshiping of a creature, the sun, now holds that position because the earth, its inhabitants and the focus of the Incarnation, is removed. This is manifest in pagan rooted green movements, global warming, evolution, and mother earth witchcraft religions all accepted in the New World Order. It begins to make sense that round, moving earth calls into question both the Incarnation and the Resurrection as Pope Urban VIII and Alexander VII taught.

On the Heliocentric globe there is no east, no west, just relative orientation. So is north 'up'? Or just 'out'? Does that mean south is down? Or just below at an angle toward the center of the ball? Without true direction operating on a level playing field, and the ground not on the level, it follows very quickly that there really are no absolutes in the material world. And with raucous contradictory environment comes raucous thought, changeable ideas, new philosophies, new sciences, relativism and modernism. With reality in question, humanity demands and obtains by 'proven science' new freedoms, and new gods to fit their ideas or such ideas are accepted by indoctrination because they fit better. In turning to false physical science and its false gods, men remove themselves psychologically, physically, spiritually away from the natural law of the true God, readily accepting what is not natural and reasonable but doing everything against truth.

The theory of relativity the child of Heliocentrism, fits with modern science and is a profoundly false doctrine intended to replace truth. Not one of the famous Heliocentric scientists lived in concert with the chaos they preached, proven when their personal lives are examined more closely:

Enstein was an atheist, plagarist, anti-Catholic and womanizer.
Keplar was an occultist,
Newton a homosexual, become deeply immersed in alchemy and embraced the Arian heresy.
Copernicus was a humanist priest with a mistress and philosophies deeply at odds with the Church.
Galileo proved himself uninformed and a liar.******

Is is so hard to believe that relativity in the physical universe is fully related to spiritual relativity? Relative directions can only manage to get a person lost, just as relative position on religion destorys one's moral compass. It's no wonder people feel free to commit adultery because, hey, lots of things are way worse! Free by relative truth in a twisted view of reality people satiate themselves in the various ways that they prefer. Man finds this excuse to ignore the law written upon his heart and consequently become like the beasts. With his constantly changing, contradictory playing field, man has become awash in confusion and sin with all the usual indicators pointing in too many directions to know which is right. It follows that the deterioration of modern civilization is firmly rooted in the rejection of God's account of creation.

(Redirected from Heliocentric theory)

In astronomy, heliocentrism is the theory that the Sun is at the center of the Universe and/or the Solar System. The word is derived from the Greek (Helios = "Sun" and kentron = "Center"). Historically, heliocentrism is opposed to geocentrism and currently to modern geocentrism, which places the earth at the center. (The distinction between the Solar System and the Universe was not clear until modern times, but extremely important relative to the controversy over cosmology and religion.) In the 16th and 17th centuries, when the theory was revived and defended by Copernicus, Galileo, and Kepler, it became the center of a major dispute.

**The Church has declared...
Whereas you, Galileo, son of the late Vincenzio Galilei, of Florence, aged seventy years, were denounced in 1615, to this Holy Office, for holding as true a false doctrine taught by many, namely, that the sun is immovable in the center of the world, and that the earth moves, and also with a diurnal motion; also, for having pupils whom you instructed in the same opinions; also, for maintaining a correspondence on the same with some German mathematicians; also for publishing certain letters on the sun-spots, in which you developed the same doctrine as true; also, for answering the objections which were continually produced from the Holy Scriptures, by glozingA.4 the said Scriptures according to your own meaning; and whereas thereupon was produced the copy of a writing, in form of a letter professedly written by you to a person formerly your pupil, in which, following the hypothesis of Copernicus, you include several propositions contrary to the true sense and authority of the Holy Scriptures; therefore (this Holy Tribunal being desirous of providing against the disorder and mischief which were thence proceeding and increasing to the detriment of the Holy Faith) by the desire of his Holiness and the Most Emminent Lords, Cardinals of this supreme and universal Inquisition, the two propositions of the stability of the sun, and the motion of the earth, were qualified by the Theological Qualifiers as follows:

1. The proposition that the sun is in the center of the world and immovable from its place is absurd, philosophically false, and formally heretical; because it is expressly contrary to Holy Scriptures.
2. The proposition that the earth is not the center of the world, nor immovable, but that it moves, and also with a diurnal action, is also absurd, philosophically false, and, theologically considered, at least erroneous in faith.

Therefore, invoking the most holy name of our Lord Jesus Christ and of His Most Glorious Mother Mary, We pronounce this Our final sentence: We pronounce, judge, and declare, that you, the said Galileo, have rendered yourself vehemently suspected by this Holy Office of heresy, that is, of having believed and held the doctrine (which is false and contrary to the Holy and Divine Scriptures) that the sun is the center of the world, and that it does not move from east to west, and that the earth does move, and is not the center of the world; also, that an opinion can be held and supported as probable, after it has been declared and finally decreed contrary to the Holy Scripture, and, consequently, that you have incurred all the censures and penalties enjoined and promulgated in the sacred canons and other general and particular constituents against delinquents of this description. From which it is Our pleasure that you be absolved, provided that with a sincere heart and unfeigned faith, in Our presence, you abjure, curse, and detest, the said error and heresies, and every other error and heresy contrary to the Catholic and Apostolic Church of Rome.

- Gerardus Bouw, Ph.D., "Why Geocentricity?" -- an article that was in press and due to appear in the Baptist Bulletin, circa Sept. 1985. Bouw is leader of the Association of Biblical Astronomy, a group of creationist Christians who teach geocentrism. He is also the author of Geocentricity, a book that argues for a literal understanding of the geocentric passages in Scripture.


*****The Prophecy of St. Nilus
After the year 1900, toward the middle of the 20th century, the people of that time will become unrecognizable. When the time for the Advent of the Antichrist approaches, people's minds will grow cloudy from carnal passions, and dishonor and lawlessness will grow stronger. Then the world will become unrecognizable. People's appearances will change, and it will be impossible to distinguish men from women due to their shamelessness in dress and style of hair. These people will be cruel and will be like wild animals because of the temptations of the Antichrist. There will be no respect for parents and elders, love will disappear, and Christian pastors, bishops, and priests will become vain men, completely failing to distinguish the right-hand way from the left. At that time the morals and traditions of Christians and of the Church will change. People will abandon modesty, and dissipation will reign. Falsehood and greed will attain great proportions, and woe to those who pile up treasures. Lust, adultery, homosexuality, secret deeds and murder will rule in society. At that future time, due to the power of such great crimes and licentiousness, people will be deprived of the grace of the Holy Spirit, which they received in Holy Baptism and equally of remorse.

The Churches of God will be deprived of God-fearing and pious pastors, and woe to the Christians remaining in the world at that time; they will completely lose their faith because they will lack the opportunity of seeing the light of knowledge from anyone at all. Then they will separate themselves out of the world in holy refuges in search of lightening their spiritual sufferings, but everywhere they will meet obstacles and constraints. And all this will result from the fact that the Antichrist wants to be Lord over everything and become the ruler of the whole universe, and he will produce miracles and fantastic signs. He will also give depraved wisdom to an unhappy man so that he will discover a way by which one man can carry on a conversation with another from one end of the earth to the other. At that time men will also fly through the air like birds and descend to the bottom of the sea like fish. And when they have achieved all this, these unhappy people will spend their lives in comfort without knowing, poor souls, that it is deceit of the Antichrist. And, the impious one! -- he will so complete science with vanity that it will go off the right path and lead people to lose faith in the existence of God in three hypostases.

Then the All-good God will see the downfall of the human race and will shorten the days for the sake of those few who are being saved, because the enemy wants to lead even the chosen into temptation, if that is possible... then the sword of chastisement will suddenly appear and kill the perverter and his servants.

1.Einstein was, for all intents and purposes, an atheist. In The Private Lives of Albert Einstein, the authors write: “Einstein’s views were atheistic in almost every important respect. He found it impossible to conceive of a personal deity, had no belief in an afterlife and considered morality an entirely man-made affair. His worship of cosmic harmony was genuine; his claims that this was the face of God were at best benign affectation” (p. 18)
2.Kepler was heavily influenced by the occult, as was his mother, and the latter’s endeavor may have led to her trial as a witch (Kepler’s Witch, James A. Connor, Harper Collins, 2004, pp. 275-307.
3.In addition to the ill-treatment of his scientific colleagues, Newton was rumored to have had a homosexual relationship with one John Wickins, a friend with whom he had lived for twenty years; and a later liaison with Nicholas Fatio De Duillier, a man twenty years his junior and with whom he exchanged intimate letters, many of which were later censored by Newton or a confidant. Newton was also deep into alchemy (illegal at the time) and the Kabbalah, the occult musings of medieval Talmudic authors. Although he was reputed to have Christian moorings, Newton embraced the heresy of Arianism (i.e., the denial of both the divinity of Christ and the Trinity). Westfall writes: “In Newton’s eyes, worshiping Christ as God was idolatry, to him the fundamental sin” (Richard S. Westfall, Never at Rest: A Biography of Isaac Newton, Cambridge University Press, 1981, 1983, p. 314; On Newton’s intimacy with Wickens and Fatio, see Isaac Newton: The Last Sorcerer, Michael White, MA: Perseus Books, 1997, pp. 235-254).
4.Upon reading Copernicus’ De Revolutionibus, one is struck by the preponderance of philosophical and humanistic arguments that he brings to his aid. As J. D. Bernal notes: “[Copernicus’] reasons for his revolutionary change were essentially philosophic and aesthetic,” and in a later edition he is more convinced that the “reasons were mystical rather than scientific” (Science in History, 1st edition, London, Watts, 1954; 2nd edition, 1965).
5.Some admirers even revise Galileo’s words to conform to the empiricist image. Broad and Wade point out Alexandre Koyré’s discovery that an author added the phrase “by experiment” to Galileo’s original wording: “Nevertheless, I have discovered by experiment some properties of it which are worth knowing and which have not hitherto been observed or demonstrated” (“Traduttore-Traditore. A Propos de Copernic et de Galilée,” Isis, 34, 209-210, 1943; Metaphysics and Measurement: Essays in Scientific Revolution, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1968). They continue: “With Galileo, the desire to make his ideas prevail apparently led him to repost experiments that could not have been performed exactly as described…The Renaissance saw the flowering of Western experimental science, but in Galileo, the propensity to manipulate fact was the worm in the bud” (Betrayers of the Truth, p. 27).

Posts : 98
Join date : 2016-09-27

View user profile

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum